Platform
Predicted vs. actual. By division. By line.
The bid is only as accurate as the post-award reconciliation. Job-cost tracking pulls actuals from QuickBooks, lines them up against the estimate, and reports variance per CSI division so the next bid learns from the last one.
Per CSI + line
Variance reporting
Daily
QuickBooks pull
Auto
Calibration feed
What this delivers
Outcomes, not just features.
- Daily QuickBooks pull of actuals against the project's bid
- Variance by CSI division (over / under / on-target)
- Variance by labor unit (which units are systematically off)
- Feed into the calibration engine so next bids tighten automatically
- Per-PM scorecards (with the team's permission)
Job Cost Tracking features
The mechanics behind the headline.
Variance reports
Per-division variance with drill-down to specific takeoff lines so the senior estimator sees what missed.
Calibration feedback
Variance data feeds calibration formulas so labor units adjust over time without estimator intervention.
QuickBooks pull-back
Daily pull of actuals against project; no manual export/import.
Related pillars
Threads through the rest of the platform.
Frequently asked
Questions about Job Cost Tracking.
- Do you support Sage / NetSuite for actuals?
- Sage 100 and Sage 300 are on the integration roadmap; NetSuite via the public API.
Next move
See Job Cost Tracking on your real bid.
Pilots run end-to-end on real plan sets. Bring one we should review.